Skip to content
Flows
Launch Intermediate · 2-3 hours

Hackathon Submission

Package your hackathon project to win: narrative, demo plan, submission copy, and judge-proofing.

Start Route · 5 steps

The route

5 steps to Done

  1. 01

    Build the judge narrative

    Judges score dozens of projects - clarity in 30 seconds wins.

    Preview prompt + verify gate ▾

    Build my hackathon narrative. I will paste the project description and the judging criteria below. Produce: the 30-second story (problem someone has, what we built, the impressive part, why it matters) in plain words; the one-sentence version for the submission title/tagline; explicit mapping of the project to EACH judging criterion (what we say and show per criterion); and the anticipated judge questions with honest answers (including 'what would you do next'). PROJECT AND CRITERIA: [paste here]

    • The story lands in 30 seconds read aloud
    • Every scored criterion has a mapped answer
    • Hard questions have honest answers
  2. 02

    Script the demo

    Two minutes, one story, zero deaths.

    Preview prompt + verify gate ▾

    Script my 2-3 minute hackathon demo. Structure: 15-second problem hook; the core flow demoed as one user story (click-by-click beats with narration lines); the technical impressive beat explained in one plain sentence; the criterion callouts woven in ('this is the [criterion] part'); a closing line on impact. For EVERY beat that touches network/AI/live data: define the fallback (pre-loaded state, recorded clip, cached result). Include the reset-to-start procedure between judging sessions.

    • The demo is one story, not a tour
    • Every risky beat has a fallback
    • Reset procedure exists
  3. 03

    Write the submission

    The written entry is scored too - write to the rubric.

    Preview prompt + verify gate ▾

    Write my submission copy. Produce: title and tagline (from the narrative); the description structured as problem, solution, how it works, what is technically interesting, what we would do next - with the judging criteria keywords appearing naturally where earned; the tech stack list; honest 'built during the hackathon' scope notes; and the links section (demo URL, video, repo) with a one-line instruction for judges on the fastest path to the wow moment ('Click Run Demo Flow').

    • Criteria keywords appear where genuinely earned
    • Scope honesty is included
    • The fast path to wow is stated
  4. 04

    Judge-proof the app

    Judges click everything - nothing may be dead or fake.

    Preview prompt + verify gate ▾

    Judge-proof my app before submission. Do a full pass as a hostile judge: click every button and link (no dead or fake controls); test the empty/fresh state a judge sees on first load (seed impressive-but-honest demo data if allowed); verify the app works logged-out or provide one-click demo access (no signup wall for judges); check load speed and mobile in case judges use phones; kill console errors on the main path. Report and fix everything found.

    • No dead/fake controls remain
    • First-load state is impressive without login friction
    • Console is clean on the demo path
  5. 05

    Run the cold test

    The final proof: a stranger completes the judge path unaided.

    Preview prompt + verify gate ▾

    Design and run the cold test. Give someone (or simulate as an outsider) only what judges get: the submission text and links. They must: understand the project from the copy, reach the wow moment via the stated fast path, and score it against the criteria - while I watch silently. Capture: where they got confused, what they clicked that failed, how long to wow, and their criterion scores. Fix the top 3 friction points and re-verify the submission requirement checklist (deadline format, video length, required fields) one final time.

    • The tester reached wow unaided
    • Top friction points were fixed
    • Every rule requirement is checked